tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3928114158099467549.post4252422409255250790..comments2023-07-26T13:12:17.200+01:00Comments on Catholicus Nua: Abortion, FF, Colm Keaveney and the Archbishop of DublinCatholicushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06817034570148526694noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3928114158099467549.post-68700815362939294892013-05-31T13:50:19.091+01:002013-05-31T13:50:19.091+01:00“I’m a Catholic and I don’t interfere in the messa...“I’m a Catholic and I don’t interfere in the messages of the church. I have no comment to make on what the cardinal from the Vatican says,” Mr Kenny said.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3928114158099467549.post-34916792300436893522013-05-30T22:47:29.605+01:002013-05-30T22:47:29.605+01:00I'm sorry to say I've given up on waiting ...I'm sorry to say I've given up on waiting for episcopal leadership from Archbishop Martin. I continue to pray for him, of course. If a priest takes his duty to lead in faith and morals he won't become a Bishop. Lyndanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3928114158099467549.post-85228368379915845152013-05-30T22:38:10.939+01:002013-05-30T22:38:10.939+01:00Archbishop Diarmuid's intervention was late in...Archbishop Diarmuid's intervention was late in coming, half-hearted when it came, and perverse in its approach. And why make it in the Irish Times? Should it not have been the subject of a pastoral letter? Oh, I forgot, the Archbishop of Dublin does not write pastoral letters. Yep, it's true. Eight years as Archbishop, and combined number of pastoral letters is diddly squat. Could it be that he, eh, doesn't have anything to say? The hungry sheep look up.Peadarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3928114158099467549.post-8157772609158216792013-05-30T22:00:13.330+01:002013-05-30T22:00:13.330+01:00"Non-viability" is an inherently irrati..."Non-viability" is an inherently irrational concept in the context of a living child in utero. A child that is living and would continue to live, if not ripped out of his mother's womb, is viable, as in capable of continuing to live, no matter what his age, if he is left in peace to continue to live where he should live until the time for his birth. "Viability" and non-viability" in the context of the intentional killing of a child in utero is a false notion subjugated to the purported justification of the deliberate killing of a child - who would continue to live, if left alone, in peace, and his inherent right to life respected, not violated. Lyndanoreply@blogger.com